Overview of Climate Change
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in global temperatures and weather patterns, primarily driven by human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas. This process releases greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, which trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, leading to global warming. The impacts of climate change are wide-ranging and include more frequent and severe weather events (like hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires), rising sea levels, melting polar ice, and disruptions to ecosystems and biodiversity. Addressing climate change requires urgent, collective efforts in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and promoting sustainable practices to mitigate its effects and adapt to its inevitable consequences. Here we will discuss the insufficient efforts that have been made by humanity to control this rapidly growing phenomenon.
Arguments in favor that Humanity’s Response to Climate Change is Merely Rhetoric
1. Failure to Meet Emission Reduction Targets
Example: The Paris Agreement
The Paris Agreement of 2015 was celebrated as a landmark in climate action, with countries pledging to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, ideally to 1.5 degrees, compared to pre-industrial levels. However, several reports show that countries are not meeting their targets, and global emissions are still on the rise. According to the United Nations Environment Programme, even if all current pledges were fully implemented, the world would still be on track for approximately 2.7 degrees of warming by the end of the century.
Many countries that signed the Paris Agreement have not implemented aggressive enough policies to achieve their pledges, demonstrating that the agreement largely remains symbolic without the required accountability and enforcement mechanisms.
READ MORE: PACIFIC INSIGHT
2. Fossil Fuel Subsidies Persist Despite Green Commitments
Example: G20 Nations and Fossil Fuel Subsidies
The G20 nations, which include some of the world’s largest economies, pledged in 2009 to phase out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies.” Despite this promise, reports indicate that these countries have continued to provide over $3.3 trillion in subsidies to the fossil fuel industry between 2015 and 2019. For example, in 2020 alone, the U.S. government provided nearly $20 billion in direct subsidies to oil, gas, and coal companies. This ongoing support demonstrates a disconnect between governments’ public climate commitments and their economic policies, undermining their supposed dedication to combating climate change.
3. Failure of International Climate Summits to Produce Binding Actions
Example: COP Summits
The Conference of the Parties (COP) climate summits, such as COP26 in Glasgow, are major gatherings where global leaders announce climate commitments. However, these conferences have consistently fallen short of binding commitments, relying instead on voluntary pledges. Despite the rhetoric surrounding these summits, such as the phrase “building back better,” the lack of enforceable targets and accountability mechanisms means that many nations can participate without taking substantial action.
A notable example is the pledge to phase out coal, where over 40 countries agreed to reduce coal usage “over time” but without set deadlines. Moreover, major coal-dependent economies like China, the U.S., and India did not commit to the phase-out, reflecting the limitations of non-binding agreements.
4. Continued Deforestation Despite Reforestation Promises
Example: Amazon Rainforest and Brazilian Policies
Forests are crucial carbon sinks, yet deforestation continues unabated in critical regions like the Amazon. Although Brazil pledged to reduce deforestation rates under international agreements, government policies, particularly under former President Jair Bolsonaro, actively encouraged logging, mining, and agricultural expansion in the Amazon. Data from the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research shows that deforestation in the Amazon reached a 12-year high in 2020, directly undermining the country’s climate pledges. This case shows how governments often support reforestation and conservation rhetorically but fail to implement policies that match these declarations.
5. Corporate “Greenwashing” Rather than Genuine Change
Example: Oil and Gas Companies’ Net-Zero Commitments
Many major oil and gas corporations, like ExxonMobil and Shell, have made public commitments to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. However, research indicates that these companies continue to invest heavily in new oil and gas projects, which contradicts their net-zero claims. For instance, Shell announced its “Powering Progress” strategy with a commitment to reach net-zero by 2050 but later revealed plans to expand its fossil fuel operations.
Similarly, BP rebranded itself as “Beyond Petroleum” years ago, yet its investments in renewable energy remain a small fraction of its total expenditures. This tendency to promote an environmentally friendly image while continuing harmful practices demonstrates that many corporate commitments are primarily aimed at improving public relations rather than reducing emissions.
6. Inadequate Financial Support for Developing Countries
Example: Climate Finance and the Green Climate Fund
In 2009, developed nations pledged to provide $100 billion per year by 2020 to help developing countries address climate change. This promise was reaffirmed in subsequent COP agreements. However, reports indicate that this target has not been met, with estimates suggesting the actual amount delivered falls significantly short. Many developing countries, especially those in vulnerable regions like sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, rely on these funds to transition to cleaner energy sources and adapt to climate impacts. The unfulfilled promise undermines the global commitment to equity in climate action and reveals a gap between rhetorical promises and financial action.
7. Slow Transition to Renewable Energy in Key Economies
Example: Germany’s Coal Dependency
Germany has long been seen as a leader in renewable energy, with its “Energiewende” (energy transition) policy aiming to phase out coal and increase the use of renewables. However, coal still accounts for a significant portion of Germany’s energy mix. In 2021, coal made up over a quarter of Germany’s electricity production. The country also delayed its initial target to phase out coal to 2038, illustrating the challenges of transitioning away from fossil fuels. While Germany’s energy policy is often highlighted as progressive, its continued reliance on coal demonstrates that even ambitious commitments can fall short in practice.
8. Insufficient Climate Adaptation Measures for Vulnerable Communities
Example: Flooding and Sea-Level Rise in Coastal Cities
While there is significant discussion about “building resilience” against climate change, actual adaptation efforts in many vulnerable communities are lacking. For example, in regions like South Asia and coastal U.S. cities, sea-level rise has caused more frequent and severe flooding. While governments discuss adaptation at international forums, on-the-ground measures, such as constructing levees, updating building codes, or relocating populations, often remain underfunded and incomplete.
In Bangladesh, for instance, rising sea levels have displaced millions, yet funding and support for relocation and adaptation have been limited. This gap between rhetoric on adaptation and real action leaves vulnerable populations exposed to climate risks.
9. Weak Enforcement of Climate Policies
Example: EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS)
The EU’s Emissions Trading System, the largest carbon market in the world, was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capping and trading emissions allowances. However, criticisms have arisen over its effectiveness, as loopholes allow companies to buy cheap carbon credits or receive free allowances. Furthermore, initial caps were set too high to incentivize meaningful reductions, leading to years where emissions exceeded targets. This demonstrates how even structured climate policies can be undermined by weak enforcement mechanisms, rendering them ineffective.
Conclusion
The examples above highlight a pervasive pattern where climate change commitments often fall short of meaningful action. From missed targets and insufficient adaptation measures to continued reliance on fossil fuels, it’s clear that rhetoric often outweighs actual progress. For humanity to effectively address climate change, it’s critical to move beyond symbolic commitments toward impactful, enforceable actions.
